Rtx 3060 Ti Vs Gtx 1080
Toll now 457$ Games supported 100% Price at present 532$ Games supported 100% Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for coin and other general parameters. Value for money To get the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. Full general functioning parameters such every bit number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, simply for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing i. For desktop video cards it's interface and motorbus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors take no defended VRAM and use a shared role of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a dominion, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (and so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may modify the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will show useful if you need some item technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming criterion functioning comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you observe some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, we usually prepare issues quickly. This is probably the virtually ubiquitous benchmark, office of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics menu a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing iv separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the concluding being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. Information technology used iv tests based on two scenes, one existence few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark xi is now superseded by Time Spy. Criterion coverage: 17% Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX xi feature level 10 criterion that was used for home PCs and bones notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Simply like Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: xiv% Fire Strike is a DirectX eleven benchmark for gaming PCs. Information technology features 2 separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: xiv% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'due south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: nine% Geekbench five is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from xi different exam scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 5% Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1080 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Let'southward run across how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games beyond dissimilar resolutions: −31.5% +31.5% −82.vii% +82.vii% +14.five% −14.5% +94.2% −94.2% −50% +fifty% −30.5% +thirty.5% +0% +0% −42.ix% +42.nine% −32.7% +32.7% −167% +167% −60.iv% +60.4% −45.4% +45.4% −135% +135% −25.three% +25.iii% −55.eight% +55.eight% +xiv.5% −14.5% +63.8% −63.8% −50% +l% −29.two% +29.2% +0% +0% −43.one% +43.1% −32.7% +32.7% −123% +123% −48.6% +48.6% −67.9% +67.nine% −52% +52% −195% +195% −110% +110% −19% +nineteen% −42.3% +42.3% +7.nine% −7.9% −48.1% +48.1% −31.7% +31.7% −1% +i% −54.v% +54.v% −34.6% +34.6% −48.1% +48.1% +7.2% −7.two% −32.7% +32.7% −76.9% +76.9% −46.seven% +46.7% −62.ix% +62.9% −60.9% +60.nine% −32.seven% +32.7% −15.iv% +15.iv% +0% +0% +0% +0% −42.ix% +42.9% −14.6% +14.6% −61.3% +61.3% −xiii.5% +13.five% −64.3% +64.three% −32.7% +32.7% −1.nine% +1.9% −53.six% +53.vi% −81% +81% −75% +75% −44.half-dozen% +44.6% −36.4% +36.4% +thirty% −30% −22.6% +22.6% +108% −108% −54.eight% +54.eight% −38.3% +38.three% −58.5% +58.5% +57.six% −57.6% Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti since it shows better operation. Should you lot nevertheless have questions concerning choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall reply. Practise you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button almost your favorite graphics carte du jour. The nearest GeForce GTX 1080's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600 XT, which is faster by 4% and higher by 4 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080: The nearest GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6800, which is faster past 2% and college past one position in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you lot with more options to consider. Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of i to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of one to 5: Here you can enquire a question nearly this comparison, hold or disagree with our judgements, or report an fault or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSGTX 1080 vs RTX 3060 Ti
Full general info
Identify in operation rating 65 xviii Value for money 27.16 44.55 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Ampere (2020−2022) GPU code name Pascal GP104 Ampere GA104 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 6 May 2016 (6 years ago) 1 December 2020 (i year ago) Launch price (MSRP) $599 $399 Electric current cost $457 (0.8x MSRP) $532 (1.3x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 4864 CUDA cores 2560 no data Core clock speed 1607 MHz 1410 MHz Boost clock speed 1733 MHz 1665 MHz Number of transistors vii,200 one thousand thousand 17,400 one thousand thousand Manufacturing procedure technology 16 nm eight nm Thermal pattern power (TDP) 180 Watt 220 Watt Maximum GPU temperature 94 °C no data Texture fill rate 277.3 253.1 Floating-indicate performance 8,873 gflops no data Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Charabanc back up PCIe iii.0 no data Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 Length 10.5" (26.7 cm) 242 mm Top four.376" (11.1 cm) no data Width 2-slot ii-slot Recommended system ability (PSU) 500 Watt no data Supplementary ability connectors viii-pin 1x 12-pin SLI options + no information Retention
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB Retention bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit Retentiveness clock speed ten GB/south 14000 MHz Memory bandwidth 320 GB/s 448.0 GB/s Shared retentiveness - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors DP one.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Multi monitor support + no information HDMI + + G-SYNC support + no information Technologies
GPU Boost 3.0 no data VR Set up + no data Ansel + no data API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_2) Shader Model vi.4 vi.5 OpenGL four.5 iv.6 OpenCL one.2 2.0 Vulkan 1.2.131 one.two CUDA + 8.half dozen Benchmark performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 1045 Mh/s no data Decred / DCR (Decred) three.09 Gh/southward no information Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 27.63 Mh/s no data Siacoin / SC (Sia) two.28 Gh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.48 kh/southward no data Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 470 Sol/due south no information Gaming performance
Full HD 129 144 1440p fourscore 92 4K 59 60
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Loftier Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 92 121 Assassinator'southward Creed Valhalla 50−55 95 Battlefield 5 166 145 Telephone call of Duty: Mod Warfare 134 65−lxx Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 78 Far Cry 5 118 154 Far Cry New Dawn 111 111 Forza Horizon iv 140 200 Hitman 3 fifty−55 65−70 Horizon Nada Dawn l−55 139 Scarlet Dead Redemption 2 96 154 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108 157 Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 122
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 83 104 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla fifty−55 81 Battlefield 5 142 124 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 113 65−seventy Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 78 Far Cry 5 113 146 Far Cry New Dawn 108 108 Forza Horizon 4 137 196 Hitman 3 fifty−55 65−seventy Horizon Aught Dawn 50−55 116 Metro Exodus 74 110 Red Dead Redemption 2 53 89 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 98 149 The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 74 218 Sentinel Dogs: Legion fifty−55 109
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 63 75 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55 74 Battlefield v 123 114 Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 77 Far Weep 5 104 137 Far Cry New Dawn 98 99 Forza Horizon iv 112 173 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 81 109 Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 77
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74 65−70 Hitman 3 50−55 65−70 Horizon Naught Dawn 50−55 92 Metro Exodus 45 66 Red Dead Redemption 2 35 57 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64 103
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 49 65 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 50−55 60 Battlefield five 98 98 Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 52 Far Cry 5 77 110 Far Weep New Dawn 82 94 Forza Horizon 4 93 150 Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 59
Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42 65−70 Hitman 3 50−55 65−70 Horizon Nil Dawn 50−55 53 Metro Exodus 28 43 Red Dead Redemption 2 21 38 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32 56 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56 81
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33 45 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55 forty Battlefield 5 53 65 Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 25 Far Cry 5 42 65 Far Cry New Dawn 47 65 Forza Horizon 4 65 103 Spotter Dogs: Legion 50−55 33 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 51.42 68.43 Novelty 6 May 2016 1 December 2020 Price $599 $399 Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 4864 Retentiveness bandwidth 320 448 Chip lithography sixteen nm eight nm Thermal design ability (TDP) 180 Watt 220 Watt
Bandage your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 by AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti past AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1080-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060-Ti
0 Response to "Rtx 3060 Ti Vs Gtx 1080"
Post a Comment