Rtx 3060 Ti Vs Gtx 1080
GTX 1080 vs RTX 3060 Ti
Toll now 457$
Games supported 100%
Price at present 532$
Games supported 100%
Full general info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for coin and other general parameters.
| Identify in operation rating | 65 | xviii |
| Value for money | 27.16 | 44.55 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | Pascal GP104 | Ampere GA104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 May 2016 (6 years ago) | 1 December 2020 (i year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $399 |
| Electric current cost | $457 (0.8x MSRP) | $532 (1.3x MSRP) |
Value for money
To get the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
Full general functioning parameters such every bit number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, simply for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 4864 |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Number of transistors | vii,200 one thousand thousand | 17,400 one thousand thousand |
| Manufacturing procedure technology | 16 nm | eight nm |
| Thermal pattern power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 277.3 | 253.1 |
| Floating-indicate performance | 8,873 gflops | no data |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing i. For desktop video cards it's interface and motorbus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Charabanc back up | PCIe iii.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 242 mm |
| Top | four.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | ii-slot |
| Recommended system ability (PSU) | 500 Watt | no data |
| Supplementary ability connectors | viii-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| SLI options | + | no information |
Retention
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors take no defended VRAM and use a shared role of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Retention bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Retentiveness clock speed | ten GB/south | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared retentiveness | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a dominion, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (and so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may modify the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | DP one.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Multi monitor support | + | no information |
| HDMI | + | + |
| G-SYNC support | + | no information |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will show useful if you need some item technology for your purposes.
| GPU Boost | 3.0 | no data |
| VR Set up | + | no data |
| Ansel | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | vi.4 | vi.5 |
| OpenGL | four.5 | iv.6 |
| OpenCL | one.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | one.two |
| CUDA | + | 8.half dozen |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming criterion functioning comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you observe some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, we usually prepare issues quickly.
- Passmark
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Burn down Strike Graphics
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
- GeekBench v CUDA
This is probably the virtually ubiquitous benchmark, office of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics menu a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing iv separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the concluding being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. Information technology used iv tests based on two scenes, one existence few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark xi is now superseded by Time Spy.
Criterion coverage: 17%
Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX xi feature level 10 criterion that was used for home PCs and bones notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Simply like Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: xiv%
Fire Strike is a DirectX eleven benchmark for gaming PCs. Information technology features 2 separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: xiv%
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'due south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: nine%
Geekbench five is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from xi different exam scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1080 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 1045 Mh/s | no data |
| Decred / DCR (Decred) | three.09 Gh/southward | no information |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 27.63 Mh/s | no data |
| Siacoin / SC (Sia) | two.28 Gh/s | no data |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.48 kh/southward | no data |
| Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 470 Sol/due south | no information |
Gaming performance
Let'southward run across how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games beyond dissimilar resolutions:
| Full HD | 129 | 144 |
| 1440p | fourscore | 92 |
| 4K | 59 | 60 |
- Total HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full Hd
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Loftier Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4KHigh Preset
- 4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassinator's Creed Odyssey | 92 −31.5% | 121 +31.5% |
| Assassinator'southward Creed Valhalla | 50−55 −82.vii% | 95 +82.vii% |
| Battlefield 5 | 166 +14.five% | 145 −14.5% |
| Telephone call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 134 +94.2% | 65−lxx −94.2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 −50% | 78 +fifty% |
| Far Cry 5 | 118 −30.5% | 154 +thirty.5% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 111 +0% | 111 +0% |
| Forza Horizon iv | 140 −42.ix% | 200 +42.nine% |
| Hitman 3 | fifty−55 −32.7% | 65−70 +32.7% |
| Horizon Nada Dawn | l−55 −167% | 139 +167% |
| Scarlet Dead Redemption 2 | 96 −60.iv% | 154 +60.4% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 108 −45.4% | 157 +45.4% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 50−55 −135% | 122 +135% |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 83 −25.three% | 104 +25.iii% |
| Assassinator's Creed Valhalla | fifty−55 −55.eight% | 81 +55.eight% |
| Battlefield 5 | 142 +xiv.5% | 124 −14.5% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 113 +63.8% | 65−seventy −63.8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 −50% | 78 +l% |
| Far Cry 5 | 113 −29.two% | 146 +29.2% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 108 +0% | 108 +0% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 137 −43.one% | 196 +43.1% |
| Hitman 3 | fifty−55 −32.7% | 65−seventy +32.7% |
| Horizon Aught Dawn | 50−55 −123% | 116 +123% |
| Metro Exodus | 74 −48.6% | 110 +48.6% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 53 −67.9% | 89 +67.nine% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 98 −52% | 149 +52% |
| The Witcher three: Wild Hunt | 74 −195% | 218 +195% |
| Sentinel Dogs: Legion | fifty−55 −110% | 109 +110% |
| Assassinator's Creed Odyssey | 63 −19% | 75 +nineteen% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 50−55 −42.3% | 74 +42.3% |
| Battlefield v | 123 +7.nine% | 114 −7.9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 −48.1% | 77 +48.1% |
| Far Weep 5 | 104 −31.7% | 137 +31.7% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 98 −1% | 99 +i% |
| Forza Horizon iv | 112 −54.v% | 173 +54.v% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt | 81 −34.6% | 109 +34.6% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 50−55 −48.1% | 77 +48.1% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 74 +7.2% | 65−70 −7.two% |
| Hitman 3 | 50−55 −32.7% | 65−70 +32.7% |
| Horizon Naught Dawn | 50−55 −76.9% | 92 +76.9% |
| Metro Exodus | 45 −46.seven% | 66 +46.7% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35 −62.ix% | 57 +62.9% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 64 −60.9% | 103 +60.nine% |
| Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey | 49 −32.seven% | 65 +32.7% |
| Assassinator's Creed Valhalla | 50−55 −15.iv% | 60 +15.iv% |
| Battlefield five | 98 +0% | 98 +0% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 +0% | 52 +0% |
| Far Cry 5 | 77 −42.ix% | 110 +42.9% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 82 −14.6% | 94 +14.6% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 93 −61.3% | 150 +61.3% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 50−55 −xiii.5% | 59 +13.five% |
| Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 42 −64.3% | 65−70 +64.three% |
| Hitman 3 | 50−55 −32.7% | 65−70 +32.7% |
| Horizon Nil Dawn | 50−55 −1.nine% | 53 +1.9% |
| Metro Exodus | 28 −53.six% | 43 +53.vi% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21 −81% | 38 +81% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 32 −75% | 56 +75% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 56 −44.half-dozen% | 81 +44.6% |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 33 −36.4% | 45 +36.4% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 50−55 +thirty% | forty −30% |
| Battlefield 5 | 53 −22.6% | 65 +22.6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 +108% | 25 −108% |
| Far Cry 5 | 42 −54.eight% | 65 +54.eight% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 47 −38.3% | 65 +38.three% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65 −58.5% | 103 +58.5% |
| Spotter Dogs: Legion | 50−55 +57.six% | 33 −57.6% |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 51.42 | 68.43 |
| Novelty | 6 May 2016 | 1 December 2020 |
| Price | $599 | $399 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 4864 |
| Retentiveness bandwidth | 320 | 448 |
| Chip lithography | sixteen nm | eight nm |
| Thermal design ability (TDP) | 180 Watt | 220 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
since it shows better operation.
Should you lot nevertheless have questions concerning choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall reply.
Bandage your vote
Practise you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button almost your favorite graphics carte du jour.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 by AMD
The nearest GeForce GTX 1080's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600 XT, which is faster by 4% and higher by 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080:
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti past AMD
The nearest GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6800, which is faster past 2% and college past one position in our rating.
Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3060 Ti:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you lot with more options to consider.
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of i to 5:
Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of one to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can enquire a question nearly this comparison, hold or disagree with our judgements, or report an fault or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1080-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060-Ti
0 Response to "Rtx 3060 Ti Vs Gtx 1080"
Post a Comment